BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 14.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16011104T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010311T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20121004T172535Z
DESCRIPTION:India: Decision Making on External Security Issues\n\nThe focus
	 here will be on how India makes key external-security decisions—e.g.\, 
	war plans\, use of force\, and major defense acquisitions. The US clearly 
	has high stakes in Indian security choices: a rising India can be seen as 
	a counterweight to China\, India can be seen as a geopolitical/security pa
	rtner for the US\, and as a mega-arms purchaser\, India can be seen as a m
	ajor market for US arms\, with the bonus of US-Indian interoperability. Wh
	y focus on how India makes these decisions? The U.S. tends to focus on out
	puts/outcomes of high concern to the U.S. We often infer India’s intenti
	ons from what India decides\, ignoring how it decides and what internal fa
	ctors influence choices. But anticipating what India will do\, keeping U.S
	. expectations realistic\, and monitoring the potential for closer collabo
	ration require a deeper understanding of several factors. What are the und
	erlying debates that shape India’s external-security decisions? Who real
	ly decides what in India? Who/what can be mustered to inform and support d
	ecision making? What are the domestic pressures on decision makers?\n\nPol
	ly (Mary) Nayak consults\, lectures\, and writes on issues ranging from So
	uth Asia and proliferation to terrorism and intelligence analysis. Ms. Nay
	ak serves on the Sandia National Laboratories Distinguished Advisory Panel
	. She teaches at several government agencies and at the Foreign Service In
	stitute and lectures at universities and foreign policy organizations arou
	nd the country. Ms. Nayak retired in 2002 from CIA's Senior Intelligence S
	ervice\; her intelligence career encompassed diverse issues and regions. A
	s the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)-appointed Issue Manager for S
	outh Asia from 1995-2001\, she was the Intelligence Community's senior off
	icial and expert on the region\, drawing on her extensive experience there
	. Ms. Nayak earlier was Deputy Chief of the Director of Intelligence's (DI
	) Africa Division (1992-1995)\, managed analysis on South America and on A
	frica\, and was a briefer on the President's Daily Brief staff (1986-87). 
	Ms. Nayak capped her CIA career with a Federal Executive Fellowship at the
	 Brookings Institution in Washington (2001-2002.) She has published numero
	us articles since then\, including a co-authored monograph (2006) based on
	 interviews of senior US policy makers who helped avert war between India 
	and Pakistan in 2002\, in the midst of Operation Enduring Freedom. Ms. Nay
	ak’s publications in 2011 included two monographs—Aiding Without Abett
	ing\, on US aid to Pakistan\, and The Unfinished Crisis: US Crisis Managem
	ent After the 2008 Mumbai Attacks. She also published two book chapters in
	 2011—“Prospects for U.S.-India Counter Terrorism Cooperation: An Hist
	orical Perspective” and “U.S. Crisis Management in South Asia’s Twin
	 Peaks Crisis.”\n
DTEND;TZID="Eastern Standard Time":20121102T150000
DTSTAMP:20121004T172535Z
DTSTART;TZID="Eastern Standard Time":20121102T140000
LAST-MODIFIED:20121004T172535Z
LOCATION:Parsons Auditorium
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=en-us:Colloquium - Polly Nayak\, Independent Consultant - 
	India: Decision Making on External Security Issues
TRANSP:OPAQUE
UID:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E008000000007063814332A2CD01000000000000000
	010000000E5F04E97E65B094FAEA6546A81C0A7AF
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//E
	N">\n<HTML>\n<HEAD>\n<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server ve
	rsion 08.01.0240.003">\n<TITLE></TITLE>\n</HEAD>\n<BODY>\n<!-- Converted f
	rom text/rtf format -->\n\n<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SP
	AN LANG="en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><B><FONT FACE="Arial">Ind
	ia: Decision Making on External Security Issues</FONT></B></SPAN></P>\n\n<
	P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="
	en-us"></SPAN></P>\n\n<P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-
	us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><FONT FACE="Arial">The focus here will be on
	 how India makes key external-security decisions—e.g.\, war plans\, use 
	of force\, and major defense acquisitions. The US clearly has high stakes 
	in Indian security choices: a rising India can be seen as a counterweight 
	to China\, India can be seen as a geopolitical/security partner for the US
	\, and as a mega-arms purchaser\, India can be seen as a major market for 
	US arms\, with the bonus of US-Indian interoperability. Why focus on how I
	ndia makes these decisions? The U.S. tends to focus on outputs/outcomes of
	 high concern to the U.S. We often infer India’s intentions from what In
	dia decides\, ignoring how it decides and what internal factors influence 
	choices. But anticipating what India will do\, keeping U.S. expectations r
	ealistic\, and monitoring the potential for closer collaboration require a
	 deeper understanding of several factors. What are the underlying debates 
	that shape India’s external-security decisions? Who really decides what 
	in India? Who/what can be mustered to inform and support decision making? 
	What are the domestic pressures on decision makers?</FONT></SPAN></P>\n\n<
	P DIR=LTR><SPAN LANG="en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"><B></B></SPA
	N><SPAN LANG="en-us"><B><FONT FACE="Arial">Polly (Mary) Nayak</FONT></B></
	SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us
	"> <FONT FACE="Arial">consults\, lectures\, and writes on issues ranging f
	rom South Asia and proliferation to terrorism and intelligence analysis. M
	s. Nayak serves on the Sandia National Laboratories Distinguished Advisory
	 Panel. She teaches at several government agencies and at the Foreign Serv
	ice Institute and lectures at universities and foreign policy organization
	s around the country. Ms. Nayak retired in 2002 from CIA's Senior Intellig
	ence Service\; her intelligence career encompassed diverse issues and regi
	ons. As the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI)-appointed Issue Manager
	 for South Asia from 1995-2001\, she was the Intelligence Community's seni
	or official and expert on the region\, drawing on her extensive experience
	 there. Ms. Nayak earlier was Deputy Chief of the Director of Intelligence
	's (DI) Africa Division (1992-1995)\, managed analysis on South America an
	d on Africa\, and was a briefer on the President's Daily Brief staff (1986
	-87). Ms. Nayak capped her CIA career with a Federal Executive Fellowship 
	at the Brookings Institution in Washington (2001-2002.) She has published 
	numerous articles since then\, including a co-authored monograph (2006) ba
	sed on interviews of senior US policy makers who helped avert war between 
	India and Pakistan in 2002\, in the midst of Operation Enduring Freedom. M
	s. Nayak’s publications in 2011 included two monographs—Aiding Without
	 Abetting\, on US aid to Pakistan\, and The Unfinished Crisis: US Crisis M
	anagement After the 2008 Mumbai Attacks. She also published two book chapt
	ers in 2011—“Prospects for U.S.-India Counter Terrorism Cooperation: A
	n Historical Perspective” and “U.S. Crisis Management in South Asia’
	s Twin Peaks Crisis.”</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=
	"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG="en-us"></SPAN></P>\n\n</BODY>\n</HTML>
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-AUTOFILLLOCATION:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-AUTOSTARTCHECK:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
